Welcome (to self)
Welcome to self, I say to me. I am in innards of embedded beds of rosy cheeks and all the checkered men's self-loathing dashboard confessional triggered such. So says I. In the sunshine. While drinking wine. On tents of grass I lay my hand while my flaking nails poke my teeth and dissolve my Freudian slip-knots of sound.
I love the intertexuality of the internets, especially that of the blog. It's the ultimate post-modern device (get it? POST modern! Huh Huh Huh!). At certain times I aim to be clear, concise and coherent, while at others I aim to be completely obtuse. But no matter how hard I try, I'll never be as absurd as our own president of these United (altered) States. Here's an example from a recent speech:
"Because the - all which is on the table begins to address the bigcost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculate, for example, is on the table; whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increasesor price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that arebeing considered. And when you couple that, those different costdrivers, affecting those - changing those with personal accounts, theidea is to get what has been promised more likely to be - or closerdelivered to what has been promised. Does that make any sense to you?
"It's kind of muddled. Look, there's a series of things that cause the- like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increaseof wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggestedthat we calculate - the benefits will rise based upon inflation, asopposed to wage increases. There is a reform that would help solve thered if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefitsgrow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those - if that growthis affected, it will help on the red."
You get the point. Man, I'd hate to be the guy who had to transpose the transcript of that speech.
Anyway, this is my blog, this is my first post. I'll leave it at that for now, and make sure I post more later. Until then, Peace and blessings.
I love the intertexuality of the internets, especially that of the blog. It's the ultimate post-modern device (get it? POST modern! Huh Huh Huh!). At certain times I aim to be clear, concise and coherent, while at others I aim to be completely obtuse. But no matter how hard I try, I'll never be as absurd as our own president of these United (altered) States. Here's an example from a recent speech:
"Because the - all which is on the table begins to address the bigcost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculate, for example, is on the table; whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increasesor price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that arebeing considered. And when you couple that, those different costdrivers, affecting those - changing those with personal accounts, theidea is to get what has been promised more likely to be - or closerdelivered to what has been promised. Does that make any sense to you?
"It's kind of muddled. Look, there's a series of things that cause the- like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increaseof wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggestedthat we calculate - the benefits will rise based upon inflation, asopposed to wage increases. There is a reform that would help solve thered if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefitsgrow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those - if that growthis affected, it will help on the red."
You get the point. Man, I'd hate to be the guy who had to transpose the transcript of that speech.
Anyway, this is my blog, this is my first post. I'll leave it at that for now, and make sure I post more later. Until then, Peace and blessings.
posted by Frankis Molloy at 11:48 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home